Nowadays the problems that related to the organs transplantation, is one of the most complicated juridical and legal issues. By studying the bases of organs transplants, we realize that juridical and moral documents and their interaction sometimes could cause different More
Nowadays the problems that related to the organs transplantation, is one of the most complicated juridical and legal issues. By studying the bases of organs transplants, we realize that juridical and moral documents and their interaction sometimes could cause different and paradoxical theories. The pure juridical view of jurists creates three bases, known as "domination", "national property" and "legislative property". The permit of almost any kind of organs transplantation is the consequence of these three juridical theories. On the other side, the theory of "trusteeship" or "God's absolute ownership for organs of human body" is caused by moral approach on this topic. That does not permit any kind of Manipulation on organs of human body and introduce the human as a guardian and preserver of his body. This article is to study both of those approaches from the prospective of jurisprudence and morality and deducts that each one is related to other, and cannot be considered alone.
Manuscript profile
The relationship between morality and law is a definite affirmation and endorsement of philosophers, ethical thinkers and lawyers. Ethics in the process of procedure are one of the issues that can be specifically addressed in relation to these two issues. Predictability More
The relationship between morality and law is a definite affirmation and endorsement of philosophers, ethical thinkers and lawyers. Ethics in the process of procedure are one of the issues that can be specifically addressed in relation to these two issues. Predictability principle in civil procedure is considered as one of civil fair procedure principles, looking carefully at provisions of the civil procedure code of Iran and other regulations and Shiite jurisprudence judicial discussions related to the role of judge and the evidences, predictability principle can be recognized in Iran civil procedure code as civil fair procedure principle. Documents of matching transnational procedure and documents and rules of arbitration sample significantly support predictability principle in civil procedure in judge’s performance and litigants of private disputes in relation to evidence. The relationship of other procedure principles is sometimes coordinated with predictability principle such as contradiction principle, parties’ despotic domination principle on civil claim, and the principle of judge neutrality and sometimes is conflicting with other principles of civil procedure such as prohibition of unduly prolonging civil procedure principle, the principle of civil party’s hearing right. In this field, the exact scope and the quality of implementing this principle should be carefully investigated in the light of other civil fair procedure. The sanction of violating implementation of the predictability principle in the civil procedure is invalidity of judicial decisions and possibility of research or appeal violation in this principle of civil fair procedure. The research method is descriptive and analytical.
Manuscript profile
he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic More
he special place of property in the daily life of human beings is of special importance and prominence among other issues, so much so that in the divine schools and even non-divine systems, it is a fundamental and certain principle for regulating the social and economic relations of society. It is the most famous jurisprudential rule and has long been one of the most basic rules of Islamic jurisprudence due to its extensive economic and social application. This rule establishes the pillars of ownership in conflict with the subject of ownership and the rule of domination with the public interest. Most believe that the principle of preference for public rights and collective interests It restricts the scope of domination and is in conflict with these two public interests. However, some views in the rule of domination refer to the collective and do not infer conflict with the public interest. The present study focuses on ownership based on the rule of domination and the rule of public interest The growing complexity of people's lives and social relationships, which limit the rule of domination in conflict with the public interest and even deprivation of property, has been processed so that no one has entered as above.
Manuscript profile
